Drawing for COMSENSE

USPTO serial 76647784

COMSENSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FISHER, HANNAH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMSENSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHRISTOPHER H. KOZLOWSKI

CHRISTOPHER H. KOZLOWSKI KOZLOWSKI & COMPANY5065 FOREST HILL DRIVEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, L5M 5A7CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing on-line non-downloadable computer software in the construction field for the distribution of windows, doors, window hardware and door hardwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 1, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 1, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 27, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 27, 2008DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 24, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 24, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 23, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 4, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 31, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 19, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 22, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 30, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance