USPTO serial 76648363
GLOSS-ON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILLER, DAVID S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GLOSS-ON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheldon S. Lazarovitz
SHELDON S LAZAROVITZ31 WESTGATE BLVDTORONTO, ON M3H 1N8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | laminated and poly resin plaques and picture frames | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 21, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |