USPTO serial 76648717
SONLIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SONLIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Kettle Falls, WA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Prerecorded videos, DVDs, cassette tapes, compact discs, and other multimedia products, used in connection with home schooling and formal schooling education covering topics in the area of health, math, music, science, social studies, religion, language, family development, child training, teacher training, art, voice, foreign languages, and physical education | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Printed educational teaching and instructional materials used in connection with a home schooling and formal schooling curriculum, namely, student manuals, teacher manuals, laboratory manuals, daily lecture notes, syllabus, daily lesson plans, tests and test keys, educator guides, activity projects, supply lists, vocabulary lists, book lists, flash cards, workbooks, posters, academic texts, children's books, children's activity books, coloring books, newsletters, magazines, and storybooks in the area of health, math, music, science, social studies, religion, language, art, voice, foreign languages, family development, child training, teacher training, and physical education | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |