CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SOUL PHONE

USPTO serial 76648993

SOUL PHONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOUL PHONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Justin M. Welch

Justin M. Welch Blazier Christensen Bigelow & Virr PC221 West 6th Street, Suite 2000Austin, TX 78701UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunication services, namely providing multiple user access to a global computer information network; electronic transmission of data, images, and documents via computer terminals; electronic mail services; and facsimile transmissionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 4, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2010PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Mar 2, 2010APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Feb 16, 2010PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 14, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 8, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 26, 2009MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 22, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 22, 2009RGEXREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Jun 18, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 14, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 14, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 7, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 7, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 4, 2008PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Oct 3, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Sep 25, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 24, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 8, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 18, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 25, 2008PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Feb 25, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Feb 15, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 8, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 8, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 14, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance