Drawing for IRESTMYCASE

USPTO serial 76649075

IRESTMYCASE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IRESTMYCASE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042PROVIDING PROFESSIONAL LEGAL SERVICES, NAMELY COUNSELING IN LEGAL MATTERS, DRAFTING DOCUMENTS, AND REPRESENTATION IN ADVERSARIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 21, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 19, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 19, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 2, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 2, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 2, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 2, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 2, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 2, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 2, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 28, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 2, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 4, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 6, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 26, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 25, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2007CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 16, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 29, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 26, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 20, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 28, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance