Drawing for ALL IN ONE

USPTO serial 76649089

ALL IN ONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ALL IN ONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Philip M. Weiss

PHILIP M WEISS LAW OFFICES OF WEISS & WEISS300 OLD COUNTRY RD STE 251MINEOLA, NY 11501-4149UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Mulch and seeds for horticultural and agricultural purposes separately or jointly packagedACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 26, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 26, 2009CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Jan 26, 2009CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN
Jan 2, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 31, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 1, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 1, 2008CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 30, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 29, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2007CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Oct 31, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Oct 31, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 1, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 15, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 9, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 1, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 1, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 2, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 2, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 1, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance