USPTO serial 76649209
PET ONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PET ONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tedd S. Levine
BARRY JACOBSON & ADAM JACOBSON C/O JOSEPH P DAY REALTY CORP9 E 40TH STNEW YORK, NY 10016-0402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services in the field of food for animals, live animals, pet garments, animal cages, leashes, books relating to pets, toys for animals and other pet related products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Barry Jacobson and Adam Jacobson partnership, The
- Other trademarks owned by Barry Jacobson and Adam Jacobson partnership, The
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named PET ONE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 13, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 23, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 3, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 22, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 14, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 14, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 16, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 14, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 14, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 22, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |