USPTO serial 76649455
CONVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 24, 2007
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with CONVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CONVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES DESIGN GROUP, INC.
Baltimore, MD, US
Other trademarks owned by CONVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES DESIGN GROUP, INC.
CONVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES DESIGN GROUP, INC.
Baltimore, MD, US
Other trademarks owned by CONVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES DESIGN GROUP, INC.
CONVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES DESIGN GROUP, INC.
Baltimore, MD, US
Other trademarks owned by CONVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES DESIGN GROUP, INC.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design consultation with architectural firms in the field of audiovisual systems and telecommunication cabling systems, namely, acoustic noise and vibration control in the fields of reverberation analysis, interior partition analysis and sound isolation, interior partition analysis and sound isolation, room shaping and architectural acoustics, HVAC noise and vibration control, evaluation and exterior noise and vibration calculations; design consultation with architectural firms, engineering firms and healthcare facilities for audio visual systems in the fields of radio and television broadcasting, telemedicine and virtual healthcare; design consultation with architectural and engineering firms for telecommunication cabling systems interiorly of a building for voice and data; design services, namely preparation of performance specifications, associated drawings and other desk-type studies, devoid of installation services, for architectural and engineering firms | ACTIVE | Feb 18, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CONVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES DESIGN GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CONVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES DESIGN GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CONVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES DESIGN GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CONVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 3, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 3, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 11, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 9, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2005 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |