USPTO serial 76650284
Serial No. 76650284
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 76650284?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Scarborough, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
L. S. VAN LANDINGHAM, III
L S VAN LANDINGHAM III12921 BRIDGER DRGERMANTOWN, MD 20874-3992UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | processed beans and peas, namely, great northern beans, mung beans, garbanzo beans, red lentils, green lentils, black eye peas and yellow split peas; jams and preserves, namely, quince preserves, rose petal jam, sour cherry preserves, carrot preserves, fig preserves, fruit jam, pickled cucumbers, pickled garlic, pickled shallots, pickled mixed vegetables and pickled egg plants; canned vegetables; fruit pastes, namely, pomegranate paste and tamarind paste; dried and dehydrated vegetables and plants, namely, sabzi ghormah, sabzi polo, subzi kookoo, sabzi aash, dillweed, fenugreek, savory leaves, cut mint, cilantro leaves, basil leaves, leeks, spinach flakes and tarragon leaves; soups, namely, vegetable noodle soup, barley and spice soup; dried fruit, namely, golden prunes, sour cherries, mulberries, barberries and fruit layers; dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; candied fruit and nuts; canned fish, tuna fish and canned chicken | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | rice grains, flours and by-products, namely, rice, basmati rice, Thai jasmine rice, barley, soft wheat kernel, dry vermicelli, roasted vermicelli, wheat flour, rice flour and chick pea flour; spices and seasonings, namely, cumin seeds, tumeric, spice for rice, barbeque powder, caraway seeds, black pepper, white pepper, cardamom green, cayenne pepper, cloves, coriander, curry powder, fish powder, granulated garlic, ground marjoram, kabob seasoning, shallots, barberry and saffron; flavoring or topping syrups, namely, sour cherry syrup, quince syrup, orange blossom syrup, rose syrup and lemon syrup; molasses, namely, pomegranate molasses, grape molasses, and date molasses; baking powder; pure honey, pure honey with comb and pure light honey; tea; sugar and sugar cubes; candies | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | drinking water, namely, rose water, mint water, willow water, tarooneh water, kashni water, shahtareh water and soda water; fruit juices, namely, sour grape juice, pomegranate juice, lime juice, lemon juice, mango juice, tamarind juice and apricot juice; non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated soft drinks, fruit flavored soft drinks, soft drinks flavored with tea; vegetable juices; syrups for making beverages, namely, sour cherry syrup, quince syrup, orange blossom syrup, rose syrup and lemon syrup | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 21, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2005 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |