Drawing for BIOLEX

USPTO serial 76650345

BIOLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, MICHELLE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIOLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martha Gayle Barber

Martha Gayle Barber ALSTON & BIRD LLPBANK OF AMERICA PLAZA101 SOUTH TRYON STREET, SUITE 4000CHARLOTTE, NC 28280-4000

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Proteins and other biomolecules produced in plants and other organisms in the field of biotechnology; recombinant proteins and other biomolecules produced in plants and other organisms for scientific use, namely, the development of pharmaceutical preparationsACTIVE—
005Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment, prophylaxis, diagnosis or mitigation of viral diseases and immunological and thrombolytic disordersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 27, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 10, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 6, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 6, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 9, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 6, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 27, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 27, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 27, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 6, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 5, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 5, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 5, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 14, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 14, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 6, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 6, 2008DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 6, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 30, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 30, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 19, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 11, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 8, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 5, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 30, 2005MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 29, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2005FFDMFILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2005MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 19, 2005FFDMFILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2005MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Dec 6, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2005FFDMFILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2005MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 23, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance