Drawing for BLACK MOUNTAIN

USPTO serial 76650751

BLACK MOUNTAIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLACK MOUNTAIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tod T. Tumey

Tod T. Tumey Tumey L.L.P.P.O. Box 22188Houston, TX 77227UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
013Combination Sling Seat and Waist Belt For Use in Gun Turrets of Military VehiclesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 29, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 29, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 5, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 14, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 24, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 23, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 23, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 31, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 11, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 14, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 4, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 2, 2006CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Aug 2, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 2, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 2, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 2, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jul 10, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Jun 9, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 2, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 1, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance