USPTO serial 76650808
FGF-1
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FGF-1?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rosemead, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald C. Casey
DONALD C CASEY311 N WASHINGTON ST STE 100ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2537UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS; HAIR CARE CREAMS; HAIR NOURISHERS; FACIAL CREAMS; SKIN TONERS; COSMETIC CREAMS; BODY LOTIONS; BODY CREAMS; WRINKLE REMOVING SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS; FACIAL MASKS; EYE GELS; COSMETIC CREAMS FOR SKIN CARE; LOTIONS FOR BODY CARE; ANTI-AGING CREAMS; COSMETIC PREPARATIONS FOR BODY CARE; SKIN WHITENING CREAMS; NON-MEDICATED SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS; SKIN MOISTURIZER | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |