USPTO serial 76650905
REVOLT AGAINST THE OTHERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REVOLT AGAINST THE OTHERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Soula Skokos
TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATOR SKOKOS LAW GROUP LLC1100 JORIE BLVD STE 220OAK BROOK, IL 60523-4421UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrotechnical and electronic apparatuses and instruments, namely, amplifiers; amplifier enclosures; audio speakers; speaker enclosures; amplifier cabinets; loud speaker cabinets; amplifier electric cords; amplifier carriers, namely, carrying cases specially adapted for amplifiers; amplifier covers; electric switches; electronic amplifier volume and tone controls; microphones; sound recording apparatus; electronic effects pedals for use with sound amplifiers; graphic equalizers; reverberation units, namely, echo sounding devices; signal processors that feature signal delays; electronic echo units, namely, electronic echo sounding devices; electronic stereo tuners; electronic foot pedal controls for use with sound amplifiers, namely, wahwah pedals; chorus and flange pedals; impression and gate pedals; delay and reverb pedals; overdrive pedals; envelope and synthesizer pedals, equalization pedals; expression pedals; multi-effect pedals and boards; octave and pitch shift pedals, phrase and looping pedals; tremolo and vibrato pedals; volume pedals; guitar amplifier simulators; electric foot switches; gateway routers in the nature of computer control hardware and electric midi pickups for use with musical instruments; multi effect boards, namely, guitar effects processor; guitar rack effect processors; talk boxes, namely, electronic effect pedals for use with sound amplifiers; guitar amplifiers and replacement parts sold as a unit; musical instrument power adaptors and electric cords; cabling, namely, connecting electrical cables; mains, namely, audio transformers; tag boards, namely, audio circuit boards; sequencers, namely, sound recording apparatus; echo chambers, namely, echo sounders; mixing desks, namely, sound mixers; amplifiers sold as a unit with amplifier handles, amplifier knobs, amplifier corners, amplifier tube shields, amplifier thumb screws, amplifier legs, audio vacuum tubes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 18, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2005 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |