USPTO serial 76650987
JESUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JESUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer carrying cases; jackets for computer discs; mouse pads | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | transfers, iron-on and plastic similar to decals; address books; address labels; address lists; adhesive labels; adhesive notepads; adhesive notepaper; ball pens; ball-point pens; book covers; book cover paper; bumper stickers; daily planners; day planners; decals; envelopes for stationery use; fountain pens; illustrated note pads; impression stamps; ink pens; ink stamps; leather book covers; note pad holders; note pads; note paper; office stationery; paper; paper bags; paper mats; paper note tablets; paper party bags; paper stationery; pen and pencil cases; and pen cases; pen holders; pens; printed paper labels; printed paper signs; protective covers for books; roller ball pens; rubber stamps; rubber stamps stamp pads; stationery; stationery writing paper and envelopes; stationery-type portfolios; textile gift bags for wine; textile wine gift bags; time planner; writing instruments; writing pads; writing paper; writing paper holders; writing paper pads; writing tablets | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | baseball caps; cap visors; caps clothing; caps with visors; dress shirts; golf caps; golf shirts; gym shorts; gym suits; headbands; infant and toddler one piece clothing; infant wear; jackets; jerseys; clothing jogging outfits; knit shirts; knitted caps; lounge wear; neck ties; night wear; open-necked shirts; pajamas; pants; parkas; polo shirts; rain jackets; rain suits; rain wear; robes; sandals; shirts; shorts; short sleeved or long sleeved t-shirts; short sleeved shirts; ski wear; skirts; sleep wear; sleeveless jerseys; sneakers; socks; sports shirts; sun visors; suspenders for men; suspenders for women; suspenders; sweat bands; sweat pants; sweat shirts; sweat shorts; sweat suits; sweat bands; sweaters; tank-tops; ties as clothing; t-shirts; visors; walking shorts; warm up suits; waterproof jackets and pants; wetsuits; wind resistent jackets; wind jammers; wind shirts; wind jackets; wristbands | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | beer; aerated waters | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | advertising, business admin | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | insurance, financial affairs | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | telecommunications | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | providing food, drink and svs; not classified | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MABERRY, PAUL ANDERSON
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named JESUS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2005 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |