USPTO serial 76651187
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $1,950
Famborough, Hampshire, GB
Famborough, Hampshire, GB
Famborough, Hampshire, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christina J. Moser
Christina J. Moser BakerHostetlerKey Tower, Suite 2000127 Public SquareCleveland, OH 44114| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | LASER ANEMOMETERS, LASER DOPPLER ANEMOMETERS, LASER DOPPLER VELOCIMETERS (LDVS), LASER RADARS (LIDARS) FOR WIND SPEED MEASUREMENT, LASER BASED WIND SPEED MEASUREMENT APPARATUS, APPARATUS FOR MEASURING WIND SPEED USING INFRA-RED (IR) RADIATION, OPTICAL FIBRE BASED LASER ANEMOMETERS, ANEMOMETERS, GROUND BASED LASER ANEMOMETERS, VEHICLE MOUNTABLE LASER ANEMOMETERS, BUOY MOUNTABLE LASER ANEMOMETERS, SHIP MOUNTABLE LASER ANEMOMETERS, AIRCRAFT MOUNTABLE LASER ANEMOMETERS, AIRBORNE LASER ANEMOMETERS, LASER ANEMOMETERS FOR TRUE AIR-SPEED MEASUREMENTS, LASER ANEMOMETERS FOR AIR TURBULENCE MEASUREMENTS, LASER ANEMOMETERS FOR MEASURING WIND SPEED IN A WIND TUNNEL AND WIND TURBINE MOUNTABLE LASER ANEMOMETERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF LASER ANEMOMETERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | MEASUREMENT EVALUATIONS IN THE FIELD OF WIND SPEED; WIND SPEED MEASUREMENT EVALUATION SERVICES USING LASER ANEMOMETERS; WIND SPEED LASER ANEMOMETRY EVALUATION SERVICES USING LASER ANEMOMETRY, LASER DOPPLER ANEMOMETRY, LASER DOPPLER VELOCIMETRY(LDV), AND LASER RADARS (LIDARS) FOR ACQUIRING WIND SPEED MEASUREMENTS; WIND SPEED MEASUREMENT EVALUATION SERVICES USING LASERS, OPTICAL FIBRE BASED LASER ANEMOMETERS, AND AN APPARATUS COMPRISING A SOURCE OF INFRA-RED (IR) RADIATION; MEASUREMENT EVALUATIONS IN THE FIELD OF AIR TURBULENCE USING LASER ANEMOMETERS; MEASUREMENT EVALUATION SERVICES FOR MEASURING TRUE AIRSPEED USING LASER ANEMOMETERS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 15, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 15, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 11, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2005 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |