USPTO serial 76651301
MAKING TIME FLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAKING TIME FLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kay Lyn Schwartz
KAY LYN SCHWARTZ IP SECTIONGARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP1601 ELM ST STE 3000DALLAS, TX 75201-4761Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Ready prepared prepackaged meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |