USPTO serial 76651558
N NATURALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with N NATURALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pleasanton, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jordan S. Weinstein
JORDAN S WEINSTEIN OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND ET AL PC1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3451UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Full line of meats; full line of poultry; full line of processed vegetables; full line of processed, canned, dried, or preserved fruits; full line of frozen, prepared or packaged entrees, side dishes and meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; full line of dairy products and dairy desserts excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; full line of dairy-based beverages; full line of fish not live; full line of fruit-based organic food bars, snack foods and spreads; eggs; margarine; full line of oils for cooking; full line of oils for food; full line of snack dips excluding salsa and other sauces used as dips; full line of snack mixes consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins; full line of soups; full line of fruit, vegetable, garden and potato salads | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Full line of frozen, prepared or packaged entrees, side dishes and meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; full line of pasta; full line of coffee-based and tea-based beverages; full line of bakery goods; full line of bakery desserts; full line of baking powders and spices; full line of breakfast cereals, full line of candies; full line of chocolates; full line of coffees; full line of flavorings; full line of flour-based, corn-based or grain-based chips; full line of frozen confections, frozen yogurt, frozen custard and fruit ices; full line of ice cream food and beverage products; full line of ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt desserts; full line of dessert puddings and dessert souffles; full line of flavored gelatin desserts; full line of herbal food beverages; macaroni and cheese; mixes for bakery goods; noodles, sauce, and seasoning toppings combined in unitary packages; full line of frozen and prepared pizzas; salad dressings; sauces; sandwiches; seasonings; spices; sugar and sugar substitutes; full line of rice, pasta, and macaroni salads | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Full line of fresh vegetables and fruits; live fish for food purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Full line of fruit beverages, water beverages, soft drinks, energy drinks, iced and frozen fruit beverages and smoothies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SAFEWAY INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named N NATURALS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2005 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |