USPTO serial 76651839
NULIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NULIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James T. Nikolai
JAMES T. NIKOLAI NIKOLAI & MERSEREAU, P.A.820 INTERNATIONAL CENTRE900 SECOND AVE SO.MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3325Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | FLAX AND LINSEED PRODUCTS, NAMELY, EDIBLE OILS, EDIBLE FATS; FOODSTUFFS FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION (EXCLUDING ICE CREAM, ICE MILK, FROZEN YOGURT AND OTHER PROCESSED DAIRY PRODUCTS) CONTAINING FLAX AND LINSEED OILS, EDIBLE FATS AND MEAL, NAMELY, FLAX AND/OR LINSEED THAT HAS BEEN GROUND INTO A POWDER | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2007 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |