USPTO serial 76651843
RENUIT RESCUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RENUIT RESCUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jordan S. Weinstein
JORDAN S. WEINSTEIN OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3451UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cleaning products, namely, exterior wood cleaner for decks, fences, lawn furniture, and buildings, interior wood and floor cleaner, aluminum and vinyl siding cleaner, concrete and asphalt cleaner, mold and mildew cleaner, multi purpose cleaner for household, commercial and industrial use, all purpose degreasing preparations not for use in manufacturing processes for use in the household, commercial and industrial fields, house wash, super metal polish, cleaning products for vehicles, namely, waterless car wash preparations, cleaning preparations for use on marine vehicles, carpet cleaners, floor cleaners, spot and spray cleaners for clothing and fabrics | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | Preparations to destroy mold and mildew; house wash, namely, preparations to destroy mildew and algae; environmentally friendly insecticides for domestic and/or agricultural use | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 5, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 5, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 5, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |