USPTO serial 76651972
RECIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RECIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah A. Nilson
DEBORAH A. NILSON AND ALAIN ROZAN Deborah A. Nilson, PLLC10 East 40th StreetSuite 3310New York, NY 10016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | (Based on Intent to Use) Perfume, perfumery, cosmetics, non-medicated toiletries, soaps, shampoos, toothpastes, essential oils and hair lotions | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | ITU-- Jewelry, namely, necklaces, chains, ornamental pins, brooches, bracelets, earrings, rings, and horological and chronometric instruments; watches, USE-- cufflinks | ACTIVE | Mar 24, 2005 |
| 016 | pens, pencils, fountain pens, fountain pen ink catridges, and fountain pen and pencil accessories; namely, pen and pencil cases, pen or pencil holders, pocket shields, pen or pencil boxes, pen or pencil trays, and pencil sharpeners, and diaries, coin holders and passport holders, desktop business name card holders | ACTIVE | Jan 29, 1989 |
| 018 | wallets, coin purses, business card cases, travel bags, cosmetic cases sold empty, clutch purses, wallets with identification compartments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LS & A LEO STEPHAN et Associes SARL
- Other trademarks owned by LS & A LEO STEPHAN et Associes SARL
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Similar marks named RECIFE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 22, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 26, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 22, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |