Drawing for THINBLADE

USPTO serial 76652225

THINBLADE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYES, GINA CLARK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THINBLADE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles E. Baxley

CHARLES E BAXLEY HART, BAXLEY, DANIELS & HOLTON90 JOHN ST FL 3NEW YORK, NY 10038-3202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Microcomputers; computer systems comprising industrial computers, industrial single board computers, microcomputers, minicomputers, supercomputer, embedded computers,sound effect cards, graphic cards, computer fax modem cards, main boards, micro-processors, Ethernet cards, communication servers, blank integrated circuit cards,computer interface boards, interface input output cards, computerized touch input device, multimedia moving pictures expert group cards, central processing unit cards,chassises, back planes, electrical power supplies, analog digital and digital analog input output cards, mainframes and hosts; pre-recorded computer discs featuring computer operating programs and programs for data processing and word processing; computer workstations, comprising terminals, monitors, keyboards, connectors, hubs, bridges,routers, graphic cards and network cardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 4, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 4, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 14, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 22, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 2, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 3, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 26, 2006CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 26, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 26, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 2006MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance