USPTO serial 76652229
ART-GECKO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ART-GECKO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PLEASANT HILL, CA
PLEASANT HILL, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | paint-it-yourself ceramic, mosaic, and wood art studio | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |