Drawing for CLOVERLEAF TAVERN

USPTO serial 76652363

CLOVERLEAF TAVERN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLOVERLEAF TAVERN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ralph T. Lilore

RALPH T LILORE60 ROUTE 46 EASTFAIRFIELD, NJ 07004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Providing restaurant services, providing bar services, providing tavern services and providing banquet and social function facilities for special occasions, all including preparing and serving meals, snacks, alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages; and food preparation services, namely, providing cooked food for on-premise or off-premises consumption and uncooked food for off-premises preparation and consumptionACTIVEJul 31, 1933

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 10, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 10, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 10, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 14, 2008RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jul 14, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 16, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 16, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 8, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 3, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 7, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 17, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 7, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 7, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 2006MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance