USPTO serial 76652367
THE FRESHER SIDE OF BETTER.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE FRESHER SIDE OF BETTER.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kay Lyn Schwartz
KAY LYN SCHWARTZ IP SECTIONGARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP1601 ELM ST STE 3000DALLAS, TX 75201-4761Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | prepared salads, namely, fruit salad, garden salad, vegetable salad, bean salad, egg salad, chicken salad, tuna salad, ham salad, turkey salad, and potato salad; dips; vegetable based spreads and cheese spreads; prepared and frozen entrees, side dishes and appetizers consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; dips and cream cheese; shrimp salad; crabmeat salad; artichoke salad; mushroom salad; red skinned potato salad, and cole slaw; barbecue chicken; prepared entrees consisting primarily of sweet and sour chicken with mostaccioli pasta with meat sauce; meat salad; seafood salad; vegetable salad; vegetable with meat salad; processed fruit pieces; country potato with egg salad; southern mustard potato salad; dixie cole slaw salad; sour cream and dill potato salad; bbq beans salad; gourmet potato salad; reduced fat mustard potato salad; tapioca pudding salad; fresh and processed meats | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | prepared salads, namely macaroni salad and pasta salad; sauces; prepared and frozen entrees, side dishes and appetizers consisting primarily of pasta or rice; rice pudding, tapioca pudding, cream desserts, Hawaiian salad dessert, cheesecake, and gelatin parfait, whipped desserts made primarily of fruit/nuts and whipped topping; pasta salad with salami and pepperoni; tortellini (pasta) salad with meat; pastry; antipasto salad; rotelli pasta salad, macaroni salad, and creamy pasta salad; prepared entrees consisting primarily of mostaccioli pasta with meat sauce sweet and sour chicken; cheese tortellini marinara, dry beef fajita mix; cheese ravioli with tomato sauce; lasagna with meat sauce; macaroni and cheese; vegetable lasagna; dry chicken fajita mix; cheesetortellini vinaigrette, dill pasta salad with chicken, and tarragon pasta salad with tuna fowl salad; pasta salad with fowl; pasta salad with meat; pasta salad with seafood; pasta salad with vegetables, herb salad with potatoes, pasta salad with vegetables, pasta primavera salad, honey mustard pasta salad, and vermicelli salad; elbow macaroni salads; macaroni and cheese salad; sour cream and cheddar macaroni salad; Italian pasta salad, reduced fat elbow macaroni salad; and rice pudding salad | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Fresh fruit pieces | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Orval Kent Food Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Orval Kent Food Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named THE FRESHER SIDE OF BETTER.
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |