USPTO serial 76652688
GREAT MOODS AROMATHERAPY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GREAT MOODS AROMATHERAPY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Brunswick, NJ
North Brunswick, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MYRON AMER
Myron Amer Myron Amer, P.C.350 National BlvdSuite 2BLong Beach, NY 11561-3327Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COLOR COSMETICS, NAMELY, LIPSTICKS, LIPSTICK LINERS, LIP GLOSS, EYELINERS, EYE SHADOWS, BLUSHERS, FACE POWDERS, FOUNDATION, MASCARAS, NAIL POLISHES, EYEBROW PENCILS; SKIN TREATMENT PRODUCTS, NAMELY, CLEANSERS, TONERS, MOISTURIZERS, EYE CREAMS, HAND AND BODY LOTIONS, BODY AND SHOWER GELS, AND FACIAL SOAP, NAIL CARE PREPARATIONS, AND NAIL POLISH REMOVERS; FRAGRANCE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, COLOGNE, PERFUME, TOILET WATER, SCENTED SOAPS, BODY POWDERS, BATH OILS; SUN SCREEN PREPARATIONS; HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, HAIR COLORING, HAIR BLEACHES, HAIR LIGHTENERS, HIGHLIGHTING PREPARATIONS; SHAMPOOS; CONDITIONERS, HAIR COLOR STAIN REMOVERS, HAIR GELS, MOUSSES, HAIR SPRAYS AND STYLING LOTIONS; AND HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, HAIR BODY AND ROOT LIFT GELS; BATH SETS COMPRISED OF BATH GELS, BATH FOAMS AND BATH OILS | ACTIVE | Sep 14, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | CNES | SU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2008 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 23, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | RGSU | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2007 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |