USPTO serial 76652995
TOP OF MIND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWIFT, GILBERT M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOP OF MIND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART PRESTON GATES ELLIS LLP
PITTSBURGH, PA
Other trademarks owned by KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART PRESTON GATES ELLIS LLP
KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART PRESTON GATES ELLIS LLP
PITTSBURGH, PA
Other trademarks owned by KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART PRESTON GATES ELLIS LLP
Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Nicholson Graham LLP
Pittsburgh, PA
Other trademarks owned by Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Nicholson Graham LLP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George D. Dickos
George D. Dickos KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART PRESTON GATES ELLHenry W. Oliver Building535 Smithfield StreetPittsburgh, PA 15222-2312Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Conducting workshops and seminars in the fields of law and business | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART PRESTON GATES ELLIS LLP
- Other trademarks owned by KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART PRESTON GATES ELLIS LLP
- Other trademarks owned by Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Nicholson Graham LLP
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named TOP OF MIND
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |