USPTO serial 76653239
ADD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ADD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Taiping City, Taichung County 411, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles E. Baxley
CHARLES E BAXLEY HART, BAXLEY, DANIELS & HOLTON90 JOHN ST FL 3NEW YORK, NY 10038-3202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Suspension parts for bicycles, brakes for bicycles, disc brakes for bicycles, derailleur for bicycles, suspension parts for electric bikes, brakes for electric bikes, disc brakes for electric bikes, transmissions for electric bikes, bicycles, scooters, electric bikes, electric scooters, suspension parts for scooters, brakes for scooters, pedals for bicycles, bar stems for bicycles, frame-connectors for bicycles, front fork tubes for bicycles, handlebars for bicycles, front forks for bicycles, brake discs, anti-lock brake system for bicycles, brake discs, hubs for bicycles, frames for bicycles, cranks for bicycles, seat tubes for bicycles, quick-disassembled devices, stems, U-shaped brake pads for bicycles, brake for bicycles, brake levers for bicycles and brake cables for bicycles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |