USPTO serial 76653296
PROCARPARTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISINGER, REBECCA MILES
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROCARPARTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KAM LOUIE
Jennifer L. Webber Fulwider Patton, LLP301 N Lake AvenueSuite 800Pasadena, CA 91101-5113Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Online retail store services and wholesale store services featuring automotive parts and accessories therefor | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |