USPTO serial 76654108
UNIVERSAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNIVERSAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen E. Feldman, P.C.
NUPUR SHAH FELDMAN LAW GROUP PC220 EAST 42ND STREETSUITE 3304NEW YORK, NY 10017 6221Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Window hardware, namely, curtain rods; hamper, shower curtain rod, plastic tissue box cover, decorative pillow, neck roll, namely, neck-supporting pillow | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 16, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 16, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |