USPTO serial 76654348
TRINITY TECHNOLOGY GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 31, 2007
- Examiner
- WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with TRINITY TECHNOLOGY GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Trinity Technology Group, Inc.
Fairfax, VA, US
Trinity Technology Group, Inc.
Manassas, VA, US
Trinity Technology Group, Inc.
Fairfax, VA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin T. Oliveira
KEVIN OLIVEIRA ODIN FELDMAN & PITTLEMAN PC1775 WIEHLE AVENUE SUITE 400RESTON, VA 20190UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF DESIGN, SELECTION, IMPLEMENTATION AND USE OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES FOR PLANNING, DESIGN, AND ANALYSIS OF INFORMATION PROCESSES, SYSTEMS, AND BUSINESS REENGINEERING; ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS, SOFTWARE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS; DESIGN FOR OTHERS OF WEB SITES AND SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS THEREFORE ON LOCAL AND INTERNAL COMPUTER NETWORKS AND THE INTERNET; PROVIDING DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND HOST SERVICES FOR OTHERS' INTERNET WEB SITES AND COMPUTER NETWORKS; MAINTENANCE OF SOFTWARE, SOFTWARE SYSTEMS AND INTERNET WEB SITES; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CONSULTATION SERVICES; COMPUTER CONSULTATION ON THE COMPUTER-RELATED ASPECTS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECURITY; COMPUTER CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SECURITY; PROVIDING INFORMATION OVER LOCAL AND INTERNAL COMPUTER NETWORKS AND THE INTERNET ON THE SUBJECTS OF COMPUTER ANALYSIS, COMPUTER SYSTEMS DESIGN SERVICES, AND SOFTWARE AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; AND PROVIDING INFORMATION VIA THE INTERNET ON THE SUBJECTS OF SOFTWARE DESIGN | ACTIVE | Jan 16, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Trinity Technology Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Trinity Technology Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Trinity Technology Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TRINITY TECHNOLOGY GROUP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2019 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 19, 2019 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 19, 2019 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 6, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 6, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 15, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |