Drawing for GO LIVE

USPTO serial 76654663

GO LIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAST, PAUL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GO LIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raymond Sun

RAYMOND SUN LAW OFFICES OF RAYMOND SUN12420 WOODHALL WAYTUSTIN, CA 92782-1165UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Video game cartridges; Computer game cartridges; Computer game cassettes; Computer game discs; Computer game software; Electronic game programs; Electronic game software for cellular telephones; Electronic game software for handheld electronic devicesACTIVE—
028Action skill games; Action target games; Arcade-type electronic education video games; Board games; Card games; Dice games; Electronic educational game machines for children; Equipment sold as a unit for playing board games; Equipment sold as a unit for playing card games; Equipment sold as a unit for playing a memory game; Equipment sold as a unit for playing action type target games; hand held unit for playing electronic games; Hand held unit for playing video games; Manipulative games; Role playing games; Stand alone video game machines; Tabletop units for playing electronic games other than in conjunction with a television or computer; Target games; Trading card gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 3, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 26, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 3, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 23, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 22, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 21, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 21, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 20, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 23, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2006MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 13, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance