USPTO serial 76655061
NGRAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HABEEB, MYRIAH A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NGRAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WESTFORD, MA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | NGRAN IS A SECURITY SOLUTIONS FIRM FOCUSED ON IT SYSTEMS, CUSTOM SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, NETWORKING, SECURITY SERVICES, AND AWARENESS TRAINING; THE WORD NGRAN COMES FROM THE COMBINATION OF TWO CONCEPTS, NETWORKING AND GRANULARITY, WHICH MEANS THAT OUR SOLUTIONS CONSIDER THE IT MODELS AS WELL AS THE DETAILS OF THE PEOPLE WHO ADMINISTER THE NETWORKS AND SYSTEMS, THE PROCESSES USED TO MANAGE AND SAFEGUARD THE INFORMATION AND THE TOOLS USED TO SUPPORT THE IT INFRASTRUCTURE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |