USPTO serial 76655131
COMPASS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHOSHO II, ERNEST
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COMPASS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David E. Dougherty
David E. Dougherty Lowe Hauptman Berner LLP1700 Diagonal RoadSuite 300Alexamdria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Bidets; drinking fountains; faucet aerators; faucet sprayers; faucets; flush levers; gas regulators; gas water heaters household use; hand held shower heads; hand showers; heating systems composed primarily of tubes, pipes and pre-assembled manifolds though which cold or low temperature water circulates; hydrants not fire hydrants; irrigation spray nozzles; irrigation sprinklers; kitchen sink sprayers; lavatories; lawn sprinkler systems comprising pumps, valves and filters; manually-operated plumbing valves; mixer faucets for water pipes; plumbing fittings namely, bibs; plumbing fittings, namely, cocks; plumbing fittings, namely, traps; plumbing fittings, namely, valves; plumbing fittings, namely, shower control valves; plumbing fittings, namely, tub control valves; plumbing fittings, namely, couplers; plumbing fittings, namely, aerators for faucets; plumbing fittings, namely, drains; plumbing fittings, namely, faucet filters; plumbing fittings, namely, spouts; plumbing fittings namely, sink strainers; plumbing fixtures, namely, sink traps; plumbing fixtures, namely, sink sprayers; plumbing fixtures, namely, shower sprayers; plumbing supplies, namely sink strainers ; regulating accessories for water supply, namely metered valves; shower faucet extensions; shower head sprayers; shower heads; shower stands; showers; single lever fixtures for lavatories and sinks; spigots; steam radiators for heating buildings; steam valves; strainers for plumbing drains; strainers for water lines; tap water faucets; thermostatic valves of heating installations; toilet tank balls; toilet tanks; toilets; tub parts, namely, tub wastes; tub parts, namely, tub overflows; tub spouts; sanitary fixtures, namely, urinals; valves being parts of sprinkler systems; water faucet spout; water fountains | ABANDONED | Oct 13, 2003 |
| 021 | Bath accessories, namely, cup holders; Bathroom glass holder not of precious metal; Dispensers for liquid soap; Drain stoppers for sinks and drains; Garden hose sprayers; Grass sprinklers; Holders for toilet paper; Hose nozzles; Plastic spray nozzles; Plungers for clearing blocked drains; Soap boxes; Soap brackets; Soap containers; Soap dishes; Soap dispensers; Soap holders; Sprayer nozzles for garden hoses; Sprayer wands for garden hoses; Sprayers attached to garden hoses; Toilet brushes; Toilet brush holders; Toilet paper dispensers; Toilet paper holders; Toilet sponges; Toilet tissue holders; Toothbrush cases; Toothbrush holders; Towel bars; Towel holders; Towel racks; Towel rings; Wall soap dishes | ABANDONED | Oct 13, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |