Drawing for OTSUKA THERANOSTICS RESEARCH

USPTO serial 76655157

OTSUKA THERANOSTICS RESEARCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
BUJA, SANDRA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OTSUKA THERANOSTICS RESEARCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arthur S. Garrett

ARTHUR S GARRETT FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3316UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Medical diagnostic test services in the field of theranosticsACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 21, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTEDโ€”
Feb 3, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILEDโ€”
Feb 3, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 13, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTEDโ€”
Aug 13, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILEDโ€”
Aug 13, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 19, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Oct 20, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETEDโ€”
Oct 18, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Oct 18, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Oct 18, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Jul 19, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Jan 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Jan 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Jan 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Dec 1, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Aug 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2006CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILEDโ€”
Aug 16, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTEREDโ€”
Aug 16, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTENโ€”
Aug 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Feb 28, 2006MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILEDโ€”
Feb 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTEREDโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance