USPTO serial 76655547
HUMAN WAKE-UP CALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HUMAN WAKE-UP CALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | HUMAN WAKE-UP CALL IS A TERM I CREATED TO REFER TO ME AND THE PROFESSIONAL COACHING AND CONSULTING SERVICES I PROVIDE; I WORKED AT THE TOP OF THE WORLD TRADE CENTER AND RANDOMLY DECIDED TO TAKE A LATER TRAIN TO WORK ON THE MORNING OF 9-11, WHICH ULTIMATELY SAVED MY LIFE; THE REST OF MY TEAM AND MANY MORE COLLEAGUES AND FRIENDS WERE NOT AS FORTUNATE; THE EVENTS OF THAT DAY SERVED AS MY WAKE-UP CALL, LEADING ME TOWARDS MY CALLING TO INSPIRE AND GUIDE OTHERS IN CREATING POSSIBLITY FOR THEIR OWN LIVES WITHOUT WASTING ANOTHER PRECIOUS DAY; NOW I AM COMMITTED TO SERVING AS A "HUMAN WAKE-UP CALL" FOR OTHERS; MY UNIQUE APPROACH COMBINES THE POWER AND DIRECTNESS OF COACHING WITH MY NURTURING AND SUPPORTIVE WAY; I EMPOWER MY CLIENTS TO BREAK FREE OF THEIR COMPLACENCY, LIMITING BELIEFS AND INACTIVITY AND STAY FOCUSED AND COMMITTED TO REACHING THEIR GOALS WHILE WORKING TO OVERCOME THE CHALLENGES THAT INEVITABLY ARISE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |