USPTO serial 76655583
GREETURES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3494366Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 2, 2008
- Examiner
- CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- TRADEMARK ASSISTANCE CENTER
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GREETURES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER H. KOZLOWSKI
CHRISTOPHER H. KOZLOWSKI KOZLOWSKI & COMPANY5065 Forest Hill DriveMississauga, Ontario, L5M 5A7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Housewares, namely, mugs, ceramic mugs, and drinking glasses; decorative glasses, namely, wine glasses and champagne flutes; goblets; decorative figurines, namely, decorative figurines of china, crystal, earthenware, glass, porcelain, and terra, cotta; and ceramic figurines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2006 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2006 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |