USPTO serial 76655619
DUCT TAPE MARKETING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUCT TAPE MARKETING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
KANSAS CITY, MO
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS MARKETING CONSULTING AND TRAINING PROCESSES AND TOOLS | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 11, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |