USPTO serial 76655653
COCKTAIL CADDY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COCKTAIL CADDY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Myron Amer
Myron Amer Myron Amer, P.C.350 National BlvdSuite 2BLong Beach, NY 11561-3327Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Plastic injection-molded glass holders that attach to plates | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 1, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 1, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 1, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |