USPTO serial 76655874
LOVE ECHOES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOVE ECHOES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Murrells Inlet, SC
Murrells Inlet, SC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN R. GARBER
JOHN R GARBER60 WOODCREST LNDANBURY, CT 06810UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | GIFTWARE, NAMELY, CHARM BRACELETS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | GIFTWARE, NAMELY, PHOTO ALBUMS, STATIONERY, BOOKMARKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | GIFTWARE, NAMELY, PICTURE FRAMES, SCULPTURES MADE OF RESIN AND COVERED WITH PAINT | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | GIFTWARE, NAMELY, CANDLE HOLDERS AND COFFEE MUGS | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | GIFTWARE, NAMELY, CHRISTMAS TREE ORNAMENTS EXCLUDING CONFECTIONERY OR ILLUMINATION ARTICLES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Utley, Maura LeFemine
- Other trademarks owned by Utley, Maura LeFemine
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named LOVE ECHOES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 22, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2008 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |