USPTO serial 76655958
MOVIEVISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOVIEVISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Pay-per-view television transmission services featuring recently released movies in English, Spanish, Cantonese, and Russia via cable | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |