USPTO serial 76656102
PERFECTLY NATURAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRODY, DANIEL S
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PERFECTLY NATURAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theo Yates
Theo Yates Miltons IP Professional Corporation225 Metcalfe StreetSuite 700Ottawa, Ontario, K2P1P9Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Household cleaners, namely, all purpose cleaner, bathroom cleaner, tile cleaner, scum remover, shower cleaner, and window cleaner; cleaning preparations for drains and drain openers; laundry products, namely, liquid laundry detergent and powdered laundry detergent, bleach, liquid fabric softener and fabric softener sheets, deodorants for use as clothes fresheners; dish detergent, namely, liquid detergent and liquid and powder dishwasher detergent | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ceres Environmental Solutions Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PERFECTLY NATURAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named PERFECTLY NATURAL
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 11, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |