USPTO serial 76656289
MK-7
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MK-7?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael S. Munk
MICHAEL S MUNK2610 111TH STLUBBOCK, TX 79423UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | FIREARM SCOPES, NAMELY, PISTOL AND RIFLE SCOPES WITH VARIABLE AND FIXED POWER MAGNIFICATION, PISTOL AND RIFLE SCOPES WITH ILLUMINATED RETICLE, PISTOL AND RIFLE SCOPES WITH DUPLEX RETICLE, AND PISTOL AND RIFLE SCOPES WITH MILDOT RETICLE; AND SPOTTING SCOPES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 21, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 8, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 20, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 2, 2007 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |