USPTO serial 76656618
IMAGEMOVERS DIGITAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IMAGEMOVERS DIGITAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steve Ackerman
Steve Ackerman THE WALT DISNEY COMPANYCorporate Legal- Trademark Department500 S BUENA VISTA STBURBANK, CA 91521-0639Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRERECORDED VIDEO TAPES, CASSETTES, DVDS AND DISCS, ALL CONTAINING ENTERTAINMENT, MOTION PICTURES AND TELEVISION PROGRAMS; PRERECORDED AUDIOTAPES, CASSETTES, CDS AND DISCS, ALL CONTAINING MUSIC AND SOUND RECORDINGS; INTERACTIVE VIDEO GAME PROGRAMS; VIDEO GAME PROGRAMS; VIDEO GAME DISCS AND CASSETTES; COMPUTER GAME TAPES; COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE AND PROGRAMS; MULTIMEDIA GAME SOFTWARE RECORDED ON COMPUTER DISCS AND CD-ROMS; COMPUTER GAME TAPE CARTRIDGES; COMPUTER GAME DISCS AND CASSETTES; VIDEO GAME CARTRIDGES; INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA SOFTWARE PROGRAMS FOR ENTERTAINMENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | PRODUCTION OF MOTION PICTURES AND TELEVISION PROGRAMS; PRODUCTION OF VIDEO AND AUDIO RECORDINGS, TAPES AND DISCS FOR OTHERS; PRODUCTION OF VIDEO GAMES, INTERACTIVE VIDEO GAMES, COMPUTER VIDEO GAMES, COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE AND PROGRAMS, MULTIMEDIA GAME SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER GAMES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Imagemovers, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Imagemovers, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named IMAGEMOVERS DIGITAL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 25, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 15, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |