Drawing for IMAGEMOVERSDIGITAL

USPTO serial 76656619

IMAGEMOVERSDIGITAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IMAGEMOVERSDIGITAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steve Ackerman

Steve Ackerman The Walt Disney Company500 South Buena Vista StreetCorporate Legal- Trademark DepartmentBurbank, CA 91521-0639

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PRERECORDED VIDEO TAPES, CASSETTES, DVDS AND DISCS, ALL CONTAINING ENTERTAINMENT, MOTION PICTURES AND TELEVISION PROGRAMS; PRERECORDED AUDIOTAPES, CASSETTES, CDS AND DISCS, ALL CONTAINING MUSIC AND SOUND RECORDINGS; INTERACTIVE VIDEO GAMES; VIDEO GAMES; VIDEO GAME DISCS AND CASSETTES; COMPUTER GAME TAPES; COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE AND PROGRAMS; MULTIMEDIA GAME SOFTWARE RECORDED ON COMPUTER DISCS AND CD-ROMS; COMPUTER GAME TAPE CARTRIDGES; COMPUTER GAME DISCS AND CASSETTES; VIDEO GAME CARTRIDGES; INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA SOFTWARE PROGRAMS FOR ENTERTAINMENTACTIVE
041PRODUCTION OF MOTION PICTURES AND TELEVISION PROGRAMS; PRODUCTION OF VIDEO AND AUDIO RECORDINGS, TAPES AND DISCS FOR OTHERS; PRODUCTION OF VIDEO GAMES, INTERACTIVE VIDEO GAMES, COMPUTER VIDEO GAMES, COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE AND PROGRAMS, MULTIMEDIA GAME SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER GAMESACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 22, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 18, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jun 16, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jun 16, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 9, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jan 7, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jan 7, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 28, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jul 28, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jul 16, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jul 16, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 28, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 4, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 4, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 14, 2007CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Aug 23, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 18, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 18, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 18, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 23, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 31, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 11, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 18, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 6, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Sep 5, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 5, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Sep 5, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 25, 2006MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Mar 21, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance