Drawing for WHAT WOULD YOU DO WITH IT?

USPTO serial 76656683

WHAT WOULD YOU DO WITH IT?

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEPHENS, SONYA B
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHAT WOULD YOU DO WITH IT??

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telephone sets and equipment therefor, namely telephones, adapters, modem; computer software for use in facilitating and managing telecommunications, namely for facilitating and managing telephone call identification and telephone call routing; downloadable software for use in facilitating and managing telecommunications, namely, for facilitating and managing telephone call identification and telephone call routing; pre-paid magnetically-encoded telephone calling cards; and computer hardwareACTIVE—
016Telephone calling cards, not magnetically encodedACTIVE—
038Providing telephone call conferencing, electronic mail services and electronic, electric and digital transmission of voice, data, images, signals, and messages; telecommunications gateway services, namely, telephone call identification, routing and management services; delivery of messages, video and data by electronic transmissions; voice mail and paging services; providing communication connections for the transmission of voice, video, data, and text by linking users via facsimiles and telephones and a global computer network; and digital transmissions of voice, data, images, signals, and messagesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 23, 2008WDLAWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY APPROVED—
Dec 31, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 19, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 30, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 12, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 6, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2006MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 22, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance