USPTO serial 76657006
IN-SITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISINGER, REBECCA MILES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IN-SITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Gemcom Software International Inc.
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Other trademarks owned by Gemcom Software International Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa M. Caldwell
IRENE M WALLER BARRIGAR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWSTE 1500, 333 SEYMOUR STVANCOUVER, BC V6B 5A6CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | customizable computer software for providing production information management systems including software providing analytical and reporting tools for aiding in accurate and timely decision support in the field of industrial mining exploration and mine management; computer software for reporting and analyzing data in the field of industrial mining exploration and mine management | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business services, namely, providing data, reports and analytics in the field of industrial mining exploration and mine management made accessible to users over the worldwide web and secure networks; business process review; data and workflow analysis and re-engineering, all in the field of mine exploration and mine management | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Installation and maintenance of computer software; consulting services in the field of design, selection and implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; custom computer programming; computer services, namely, development, configuration and customization of databases, data marts, data warehouses, analytics, and reports derived therefrom; all services offered for consumers in the field of mine exploration and mine management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |