USPTO serial 76658013
OSMO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OLANDRIA, WARREN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OSMO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karl F. Milde, Jr.
KARL F MILDE JR MILDE & HOFFBERG LLP10 BANK ST STE 460WHITE PLAINS, NY 10606-1946UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | PAINT; VARNISHES; PRESERVATIVES IN THE NATURE OF COATINGS FOR THE PROTECTION AGAINST RUST ON METAL SURFACES; COLORANTS AND STAINS FOR WOOD SURFACES; MORDANTS FOR WOOD; NATURAL RAW RESINS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF RESINS AND FOR GENERAL INDUSTRIAL USE; LEAF AND POWDERED METALS FOR PAINTERS, DECORATORS, PRINTERS AND ARTISTS | ACTIVE | Jan 26, 2006 |
| 019 | BUILDING MATERIALS, NAMELY, ASPHALT, PITCH AND BITUMENOUS ASPHALT; MOBILE BUILDING STRUCTURES, NAMELY, MOBILE HOMES, NON-METAL STORAGE SHEDS, GAZEBOS NOT PRIMARILY OF METAL, CAR-PORTS, MODULAR GREENHOUSES AND MODULAR GARDEN HOUSES; PRE-FABRICATED BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PARTS OF WOOD AND/OR PLASTIC, NAMELY, BUILDING AND DECORATIVE STRIPS, SKIRTING BOARDS, NON-METAL EXTERIOR BLINDS, FENCING AND STAIR RANDRAILS; NON-METAL DOORS AND WINDOWS; WOOD BEAMS; WOODEN DOOR AND FENCE PANELS; WOOD BOARDS; SAWN TIMBER; PLYWOOD; HARDBOARD; CHIPBOARD;GLUE-LAMINATED WOOD; WOODEN SHINGLES; WOODEN CLADDING FOR WALLS AND CEILINGS, ALL FOR CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING | ACTIVE | Jan 26, 2006 |
| 020 | FURNITURE, NAMELY, GARDEN FURNITURE AND WOODEN AND PLASTIC FURNITURE PARTS; MIRRORS; PICTURE AND MIRROR FRAMES; PICTURE FRAME MOLDINGS | ACTIVE | Jan 26, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |