USPTO serial 76658184
STAY WHITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STAY WHITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated toothpaste and non-medicated dental gels which provide a protective dental barrier, coating or sealant to whiten teeth or to maintain whiter teeth | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Medicated toothpaste and medicated dental gels which provide a protective dental barrier,coating or sealant to whiten teeth or to maintain whiter teeth; Medicated rawhide chews for dogs which provide a protective dental barrier, coating or sealant to whiten teeth or to maintain whiter teeth; Medicated rawhide chews in the nature of medicated rawhide chews for dogs but for use by pets or companion animals other than dogs which provide a protective dental barrier, coating or sealant to whiten teeth or to maintain whiter teeth; Medicated inedible chews for dogs in the nature of medicated rawhide chews for dogs but made of materials other than rawhide such as synthetic materials such as plastics which provide a protective dental barrier, coating or sealant to whiten teeth or to maintain whiter teeth; Medicated inedible chews in the nature of medicated rawhide chews for dogs but made of materials other than rawhide such as synthetic materials such as plastics and for use by pets or companion animals other than dogs which provide aprotective dental barrier, coating or sealant to whiten teeth or to maintain whiter teeth | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Rawhide chews for dogs which provide a protective dental barrier, coating or sealant to whiten teeth or to maintain whiter teeth; Rawhide chews in the nature of rawhide chews for dogs but for use by pets or companion animals other than dogs which provide a protective dental barrier,coating or sealant to whiten teeth or to maintain whiter teeth; Inedible chews for dogs in the nature of rawhide chews for dogs but made of materials other than rawhide such as synthetic materials such as plastics which provide a protective dental barrier, coating or sealant to whiten teeth or to maintain whiter teeth; Inedible chews in the nature of rawhide chews for dogs but made of materials other than rawhide such as synthetic materials such as plastics and for use by pets or companion animals other than dogs which provide a protective dental barrier, coating or sealant to whiten teeth or to maintain whiter teeth | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Toothbrushes; dental flosses; dental tapes; inter dental cleaners, namely, inter dental toothbrushes and toothpicks for both domestic and professional use which provide a protective dental barrier,coating or sealant to whiten teeth or to maintain whiter teeth | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Four Star Partners
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named STAY WHITE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |