USPTO serial 76659200
SEACHILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3383702Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 19, 2008
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SEACHILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RAVENNA, IT
RAVENNA, IT
Mesquite, TX
Mesquite, TX
Mesquite, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robyn S. Lederman
Robyn S. Lederman Brooks Kushman P.C.1000 Town Center, 22nd FloorSouthfield, MI 48075-1238UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Temperature control products for aquarium and other aquatic systems, namely, aquarium heaters and aquarium cooler unit | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TECO S.R.L.
- Other trademarks owned by TECO SRI
- Other trademarks owned by Fritz Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Fritz Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Fritz Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named SEACHILL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 19, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 9, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2014 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jul 26, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2014 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Jun 28, 2014 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jun 28, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |