USPTO serial 76659420
SUPERIOR FINANCIAL SERVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3522771Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 21, 2008
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, SUSAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUPERIOR FINANCIAL SERVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Boyd D. Cox
BOYD D COX75 N E AVE STE 506FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72701-6038UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | financial services, namely, making administering and collecting loans | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 15, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |